²ÝÁñÉçÇø

Since the year 1913, American citizens have voted to elect state senators, but that has not always been the case. Up until the mid-1850s, senators were appointed by the legislatures of the state they represented in a system that worked quite well. The idea behind this method of selection was that allowing state legislatures to elect their senators would strengthen their ties to the national government and allow them to conduct business without the distraction of pressure from the general population.

Upon the ratification of the Seventeenth Amendment in 1913, however, things changed. Senators are now elected by popular vote with each senator representing a single state, and each state is represented by two senators. Senators play an important role in the U.S. government by writing and voting on bills, and legislation that affects the people in their representative state.

Because U.S. senators have the power to approve or deny legislation that directly affects their constituents, it is important that each senator be a fair representation of the people and the politics of each state. Problems arise when there is a disconnect between politics and the people – when a senator votes based on his own agenda rather than the will of the people. Each senator’s educational background and upbringing bear significant weight in the decisions he makes for his state.

We recently conducted a survey of all U.S. senators to collect some information about their educational background. After collecting this information, we analyzed it and were able

In the nineteenth-century education for several of our presidents was strictly hit or miss for a variety of reasons. On the other hand, a couple of presidents enjoyed what you and I know in the 21st century as Ivy League educations. Fortunately for our young nation, most of these men were leaders who were able to guide our country through so uncharted waters and perilous times.

17 - Andrew Johnson

President from April 15, 1865 to March 4, 1869
Born: December 29, 1808, Raleigh, North Carolina
Died: July 31, 1875, Carter County, Tennessee, Tennessee
Political party: Democratic Party

North Carolina native Andrew Johnson succeeded Abraham Lincoln. He had no formal schooling as his family was very poor. His meager educational background notwithstanding, Johnson apparently was a skilled public speaker.

Book Scrolling has about our 17th president.

18 - Ulysses S. Grant

President from March 4, 1869 to March 4, 1877
Born: April 27, 1822, Point Pleasant, Ohio
Died: July 23, 1885, Wilton, New York
Political party: Republican Party

Ohio native Hiram Ulysses Grant appears to have had formal schooling from the age of five. He attended a subscription school, i.e., a school which his parents paid for him to attend, as well as two private schools, the Maysville Seminary, and John Rankin's Academy. He matriculated to West Point. Ron Chernow's was #1 on the New York Times

The A to Z of ²ÝÁñÉçÇø Schools

²ÝÁñÉçÇø schools are often seen as exclusive institutions with a reputation for rigorous academics and select admissions criteria.

• But beyond the surface, they offer a diverse range of educational opportunities tailored to individual student needs.
• From specialized programs and extracurricular activities to financial aid options, understanding the full scope of private education helps parents make informed choices.

This guide breaks down every essential aspect—from A to Z—so you can confidently navigate the world of private schooling.

Canva generated this picture.

A - Applying to a private school

• Applying to most private schools has become infinitely easier in the last 10-15 years.
• That's because you can apply online at most schools.
• When schools don't have online applications, they usually have all the application forms you need online so you can download them easily.
• You can also apply to many schools via the .

B - Be aware that diversity is an important part of private schools in the 21st century.

• Yes, back in the 1950s and 1960s, you might have been able to say that private schools were elitist.
• At least, that was the general public's perception of private schools.
• This perception, of course, was reinforced by the media.

In the 21st century, private schools have made the center of their mission and philosophy, as most schools seek to prepare their

You've seen the articles in major publications such as and . "Top 10 Prep Schools" or "Best ²ÝÁñÉçÇø Schools in ____" These lists invariably contain the names of schools that are familiar. But are these schools the right ones for you? Let me explain why I believe that ranking private schools makes no sense for parents like us who are looking for the right school for our children.

A flawed premise

Ranking private schools is intrinsically flawed from the get-go. Why? Because each private school is a unique entity. The essence of being a private school is that it does its own thing. It accepts the students it wants to accept. It teaches the curriculum it wants to teach. It teaches that curriculum the way it wants to teach. Each private school has its own mission statement, philosophy, code of conduct, programs, and traditions. So how is it possible to compare apples to oranges? That is essentially what ranking private schools attempts to do.

For example, look at all the features of Shattuck-St. Mary's. Maybe another school has some of the same features. Maybe it doesn't. It is up to you to determine what you expect from a private school.

Yes, you can compare things like the number of AP courses, varsity sports, extracurricular activities, and so on. But you normally will make those comparisons when

10 Misconceptions About ²ÝÁñÉçÇø Schools

There are a lot of misconceptions about private schools.

This is probably because private schools are indeed private, and often reluctant to release information to the general public..

• Unfortunately, this has more to do with the reality that many journalists don't understand private schools.
• On a couple of occasions when I have been interviewed about private schools, the interviewers asked very pointed questions designed to support their preconceived notions that private schools were only for rich kids or kids with issues.
• They were always surprised when I refuted those kinds of leading questions with facts.

With that experience in mind, here are some common myths, together with the reasons why they are simply that: myths.

Canva generated this picture.

Myth #10: ²ÝÁñÉçÇø school teachers make less than public school teachers.

Not true. This might have been the case years ago.

• ²ÝÁñÉçÇø school teachers are not unionized.
• They do enjoy some perks that public school teachers do not have, such as housing, meals, and reduced or free tuition for their children.
• Compensation is about the same in both sectors.
• The real disparity seems to occur within private schools themselves.
• Most parochial or religious schools tend to offer compensation that is on the low end of the scale.
• Administrators are not unionized either.
• Deans, admissions directors, development directors, business officers, and heads of school are generally paid competitively.
• You can research the facts by examining